Mt. Olive schools are back in session as students, teachers, staff and faculty returned to half days this past week and plan to return to full day after Labor Day on Tuesday, Sept. 6.
First day was August 31, the earliest schools have ever started in the MOSD.
While schools were off during the summer, school board leaders still gathered at their monthly meetings, hours on end, discussing a multitude of topics from the new scoreboard, gymnastics program, secretaries’ salaries, lack of school aids, building renovations, referendum for more space, personnel, legal issues and so much more.
After filling up a notebook from issues, comments and debates, “Mt. Olive Online” focuses in on just a few in the story below. To catch up on those summer meetings, visit https://www.youtube.com/c/MtOliveTelevision
click on the meetings to watch or listen.
Scoreboard
Those who have been keeping score of the new scoreboard project at Mt. Olive High School know there have been two opponents: Those who disagree and question the spending- Vs.- those who support the “jumbotron” saying it is a win-win situation for MOSD.
After all the back and forth, the latest news is the new scoreboard is in and working at the MOHS Marauder Dome.
“It was delivered on Saturday morning,” says MOSD Superintendent of Schools Dr. Robert Zywicki during the August 22 BOE meeting. “It’s here. It’s going to be working Friday night” at the kickoff MOHS football game.
“It’s eventually going to look like Giant Stadium,” he says, but for now it is a giant scoreboard, the “largest single screen scoreboard at a high school.”
Down the road, MOHS students will be interviewing coaches and players on the field; there will be playbacks; announcements; advertisers; mini commercials and so much more.
The scoreboard is the limit!
“We’re gonna get there in six months,” he says. “We still gotta learn the system students will use the cameras and do on field interviews. Students in TV studio classes, marketing, economics and accounting will get to use real life skills through use of the scoreboard.
“It’s going to be the kids running it,” says Zywicki. “It’s going to be embedded in our curriculum” and incorporate project-based learning.
Zywicki provides some background of the scoreboard project.
He says in 2019, he spoke to the Mt. Olive Chamber of Commerce so explore “how can we give back and support our kids?”
The idea came up to bring back the Ed Foundation. Zywicki serves as the mediator aka “messenger boy” between the Ed Foundation and the BOE.
At the January 2020 BOE budget meeting, the idea for the giant scoreboard was proposed and the BOE approved the project; but during the summer of 2021 the project was cancelled as a result of the pandemic. The Geodome “was the only project that went through.”
Zywicki says “I killed the project in 2020 because of the pandemic.”
That was when the Ed Foundation got on the scoreboard and offered to raise the funds through business sponsors to pay for the jumbotron, explains Zywicki.
Faced with supply chain issues, however, Zywicki pushed out the completion of the project advising all that it should be in “by the last game” in October.
“I like to under promise, and over deliver,” says Zywicki, and that he did.
“But it’s here” now, he says surprisingly.
The cost of the project is to be shared between the BOE and the Ed Foundation, which has a main purpose of supporting scholarships to students and teacher professional development.
Two sets of funding are forthcoming from five to six companies “on deck” which proposed $50K in donations, totaling $300K; as well as the Chamber of Commerce willing to sponsor 60, 30-second advertisements funneling in $120K in revenue, Zywicki shares.
The confusing part is that the BOE “was going to pay for it,” but then the volunteer group, the Ed Foundation, “stepped up to pay for it.”
MOSD “still owns the asset” of the scoreboard, and the Ed Foundation is paying the district back for any expenses it has to concur until sponsorship monies and advertisers are finalized.
“We are purchasing it and then the Ed Foundation is collecting donations,” he says.
“Just like the dome, it will take time “to make revenue from the scoreboard,” explains BOE member Dr. Anthony Giordano at the July 25 meeting. “The contract says we split proceeds 50/50, but we have a safety net; if foundation missed a payment, we pay it.”
“I have not been a fan since day one because of the cost to the taxpayers,” says BOE member Dr. Antoine Gayles at the July 25 meeting. Cost for the scoreboard originally came in at $450K and “we were told we’d get huge donations from community businesses. We also asked for letters of intent from hundreds and hundreds of advertisers who wanted to advertise. We don’t have letters of intent from these advertisers.
“Coming out of COVID, I didn’t think it was fair that this board would lay that kind of burden on the taxpayer; yet we are saying we’re going to make payment,” says Gayles. “I don’t think that’s the right way to do business.”
“The real problem is we need a scoreboard,” BOE member Lisa Fenton says at the July 25 meeting. As a sports mom, she says, “I don’t need a grandstand score board,” but with the one that was there “it’s hard to see the score.”
“I respect what you are saying,” says BOE member Chris Zeier, “but things change; I regret voting for it. It’s when you buy something under a pretense which you specifically sold and none of that is coming true. I voted yes, I’m angry at myself.”
Adds BOE member Bill Robinson: “The Ed Foundation really hasn’t raised any money, not the kind of money we are talking about. They do get donations. We’re expecting $400K in donations from one entity. It’s important because it looks nice but I don’t know how much we will make as far as ads are concerned.
“We should look at it long and hard again now that we’re getting back to some normalcy,” says Robinson. “Ed Foundation was always for the students; it was not meant to raise money for this. We’re not going to get that kind of money from the Ed Foundation; it should stay raising money for students.”
During the public portion, Karen Fiumara of Flanders expresses her concern over the scoreboard purchase. She thanks Gayles and Zeier “for continuing to speak up about a substantial amount of money that has been evaded.”
Fiumara questions the BOE on how many donations have been made for the scoreboard? How much is in the Ed Foundation? And if the scoreboard has been purchased?
She says, “As a parent and not particularly a Mt. Olive sports parent, it seems like an extraordinary amount of money with a lot of glitz and glamour. I take issue with things being sold with taxpayers’ dollars.
“I would like to know how much it would cost to tell a couple of teenagers to flip the boards like they used to when I was in school,” says Fiumara. “We’re arguing over hundreds of thousands of dollars for a scoreboard that could be minimized, that doesn’t need to be the most exaggerated thing in 50 miles for high school sports.
“This is ridiculous and we are paying for it,” says Fiumara. “Please, please, please get the answers that have been asked before you move forward any further.”
To provide some clarity to these concerns, Brian Schaechter of Flanders, who is a former BOE member and previous president of the Ed Foundation, explains the role of the Ed Foundation and support of the scoreboard.
Schaechter explains that the Ed Foundation serves as a revenue generator for scholarships. He says “nothing was evaded” with the foundation’s plan to fund the scoreboard.
He says the scoreboard was delayed six to eight months because of the supply chain issues. A shovel was not even placed into the ground for the electrical work.
“You’re asking someone to sell advertising space in vaporware,” says Schaechter. “You guys got to stop picking on the Ed Foundation when their cause is strictly to give scholarships.
“Help support the Ed Foundation; don’t trash it,” says Schaechter. “You trash it; there’s a lot of misinformation.”
The deal is: “There is an agreement,” says Schachter. “It’s an asset owned by the board of education. You get to keep it. It doesn’t fold up and move. It is here for the people of Mt. Olive…just like all of the other assets of Mt. Olive.”
He says, when it shows up there will be a sponsorship by a large company as well as several other people, says Schachter.
“You’re not entitled for letters of intent,” concludes Schaechter. “Stop asking for them. You’re just not entitled to it.”
Ed Foundation President Howie Weiss provides a clearer explanation during a telephone interview with “Mt. Olive Online.”
“Mt. Olive is so fortunate” to have the Ed Foundation, says Weiss, frustrated by the lack of support by some BOE members. “Their obstacles are not slowing us down.”
The benefit of the Ed Foundation is “it’s a source of revenue; source of income,” says Weiss. It supports scholarships and last year gave out three; two went to graduating high school students and the other to a nurse to pay for her attendance on a Holocaust trip.
In regard to the $400K to pay for the scoreboard, Weiss says “we have the support; we are in contract with folks. Burden to taxpayers is short.”
He says half of the project expense was already committed before the scoreboard had electricity.
“Big time corporations for a four to five year commitment,” plan to support the scoreboard, says Weis.
In addition, the educational benefit to students such as those taking TV production, or marketing and creating ads; students acting like reporters… “it’s endless,” says Weiss.
The opportunity for advertising can be at football games, cheerleader and band competitions, graduation ceremonies, Weiss continues.
“That scoreboard can be operational, producing funds for 40 years,” he says. “It’s going to pay for itself and then make money. There’s no downside to this. Every single nickel going back to the children in scholarships,” not just for high school, but all kids grades K-12.
“For Board of Education not supporting this, is insulting,” says Weiss. “I’m thankful the BOE agreed to do this but we need their support. They made their commitment to move forward with this.”
He says the only obligation of the Ed Foundation to the BOE is to report the finances involving the scoreboard once a year in August, once the funds are collected.
“I’m not going to destroy this effort,” says Weiss. “I’m not letting anyone derail me. We are marching full steam ahead.
“We are so excited about this scoreboard,” says Weiss, whose children attended the MOSD schools years ago. “My effort is to see this project through…to be able to give back. I’m going to see this through.
“We’re going to continue to do what we do,” concludes Weiss, “because we’re doing the best for the kids.”